If the theme of feminists becomes the main theme, the concept Wonder Woman is more honest. Her creator (Maston) knew this and destroyed Pyg Marion’s Greek myth to serve this truth. At that time, at that time, Marston claimed that there was no need to proceed from masculinity and masculinity because the ownership and internal nature of women’s comic characters, and femininity and femininity. The reader has recently seen the story red pop -up with the absolute Wonder Woman, but where did he go?
If you haven’t been there yet, be sure to read Part 1.
Wonder Woman, death after Marston
As time passed, Pig Marion’s myth was abolished in the character’s description. In 1954, psychiatrist Frederick Vertam announced innocent temptation that promoted homosexual lifestyle and had a bondage sub -text. The latter is certainly plausible, but the more important is the former. Many have read Marston’s works on characters, and we have reached the conclusion that this book features strange characters and opposes Versam’s specific moral claim. Instead, this is a reading that can further support the intentions of the book feminist. That being said, DC comics were forced to deprive many of Versam’s accusations in their minds because of the creation of comic code authority.
After Marston died in 1947, Robert Kanigar took over the book and began to shift from the extreme politics that had been injected on the first day. Versam’s accusation and comic cord authority only promoted crab pivot into trendy and conservative romance genres. Wonder Woman will discover that the reader in this place has destroyed the maiden’s looting by having a man in its role, but now Diana will be pinched after marrying Steve Trever.
Regarding the origin of the character, Pig Marion’s mythology was completely stripped from the text. Rather, Diana was a special child who received gifts from the gods and his father died in the war. KANIGHER’s pivot was completely one to establish a family -headed take for the character. Thankfully, this is not an interpretation that has had a major impact on characters for many years.
The art from the Wonder Woman story that Robert Kaniga pen. DC comics provided.
Gender brands and feminists are not the same
In influence, the reader should look at George Perez’s restarting character after the 1986 crisis. Since then, it has been defined in artistic, tone, and theme for all readers and creators.
The Perez and the hot -off industry define the work with MARV Wolfman in both the new teen Titans and the infinite earth crisis, and will be redefined with John Burn’s steel and the Frankmiller’s Batman’s work. It was done. When he was interviewed in the 13th dimension in 2019, Perez explained that there was no woman working at the company despite the DC publisher at the time, despite being a woman. And when he saw which artist DC was trying to do it, he was motivated to work on a book.
Instead, Perez continued to write Wonder Woman for more than 60 problems, and saw Diana and her brothers violently defended the position of the family chief, the first big event story, “God of War”. Moderated.
One of the most predictive changes that Perez did from the beginning of his run was to change the comprehensive genre assigned to Wonder Woman. Under his pen, this book is sitting well in the genre of mythical fantasy, the exploitation of the Greek gods is unprecedented, and many of the important enemy of Diana are replaced by mythical monsters. I did it.
This means that books often begin to concentrate on violent power struggles, such as the famous collisions in the “War of God”. The mythology fantasy was not close to a conservative and retrospective genre that romance was for the character, but it still shows important movements from the Feminist Utopia in Marston.
Furthermore, many of the characters in his character were re -processed, and Artemis referred to the creation of Amazons, “Is their gender really important?” Abraham’s religion, a former slave group has fled to the promised land through the separated sea.
DC comics provided.
In this interpretation, the creation of Amazon itself is not a feminist act, but an act of setting as the ultimate goal of searching for more men and women in order to worship God. From the beginning, Perez has concentrated the family length system as the reason for the existence of these female heroes.
There are no prescriptions for specific ways that these characters should help women on the earth. He wrote Aflodite, claiming that the goal of Amazon’s creation was to conquer men. A more modern example of this view can be viewed in Kelly Sue Deconic’s Wonder Woman Historia: Amazon.
With this selection, Perez does not even establish the context of Pig Marion’s mythology. In the second half of the story, Hippolita prays to Aphrodite for their freedom after Amazon was captured by Hercules. In Maston’s version, the goddess warns that Hippolita trusts a man and brings their freedom. Later, they are delivered to Paradise Isle as love and protection.
Rather, Perez depicts Aphrodite, which is isolated, bitter, and decay, despite the fact that this is not clearly drawn on the page. Therefore, when Amazon advised on how to regain the purity of one or two pages, it implies that it is not the corrupts of their assumed, but the rapidly rape of them. It implies that you are. Paradise Island is an unreasonable penance for the whole Amazon.
This establishes a large context that overturns Hippolita and Amazon’s institution with the father’s father’s chief. Therefore, when Diana’s birth is drawn, Perez cannot focus on Hippolita and her internal nature. Instead, it is God and their prophecy to instruct Diana’s birth status. Perez’s Hippolita can be explained at least as perceived, but she identifies her because she longs for her for her children and what she needs to do about it. I just feel what I do in this story.
The impact of the contraceptive movement that attracted Maston has been completely lost here. Even a close choice to become a mother is not given Hippolita. Similarly, in this story, God’s will has returned to the existence of the family chief. Diana’s birth is a function of Zeus and his court’s needs and needs, even if the support is enacted by the goddess. Again, I realize that women and femininity are progressing from the masculinity and masculinity, despite being framed as a woman’s victory.
DC comics provided.
Marriage with the current situation of Wonder Woman
Perez’s choice, focusing on the chief of the family, is the power of the anti -eminist. Even the rebellion, his goddess is ultimately subordinated to Zeus. This means that his depiction often opposes power and cannot express the full range of heroic women’s experiences. This is solidified by the climax of Perez, which is the aforementioned war of God. This is the Diana and the gods’ Cronas, who recruits Cronas, an older patriarch, and “ends when you defeat the wrong grandson Hecate. But this is clearly unique. Although it is not a drawback, he is the most valuable work to discuss because his work is a talented creator that has influenced a very many people.
Unfortunately, the reader can see how the pygmalion storyThread and the related themes have been deleted. They made her a feminist too clearly, left the future creators, and released the confusion of the theme that the previous creator worked. Fortunately, some modern works have the opportunity to experiment with these threads again, and readers can see how it was in our final work.
